Trade EverythingJul 11
free markets are responsible for our prosperity. let’s build more of them.
Tarek MansourWelcome back to the Industry, and thanks for your patience while my team took time last week to conspire and plot (and drink) and plan our excellent future. Humbled, blessed, refreshed. Now, on to the industry drama.
Last week, the talk of the town was Marc Andreessen’s 5,000 word manifesto. Tl;dr: technology is good, and the future will be good. We love this, yes?
“This is literally fascist.” — direct quote, more or less, from every “tech” journalist alive.
Marc’s argument was of a kind WIRED used to illustrate in almost every issue of its magazine, but the world has changed considerably since they were doing tech enthusiasm. According to WIRED’s team today, Marc is just another troublesome “merchant of progress,” a bizarre insult dropped in the middle of a several thousand-word love letter to technology-smashing Luddites. Elsewhere, in the pages of what was once the average futurist’s favorite journal, Steven Levy referred to Marc’s exuberance, along with all of the industry’s top venture firms, as examples of “late-stage capitalism.” The purpose of Marc’s manifesto, Steven seriously argued, was to “take your money, your vote, or” — he wrote this, his editors saw this, they all read this and said ‘cool, yeah, get him’ — your “soul.” From Gizmodo, this was a “Unabomber-style manifesto,” and from the unintentionally hilarious Audrey Watters: “Marc Andreessen openly embraces this violent, right-wing machismo that he calls ‘techno-optimism.’”
Artificial intelligence is good, and we should build some nuclear power plants: right-wing! Violent!
Fast Company, FT, the SF Standard, Business Insider, the Washington Post, and Kara Swisher were all equally furious with the notion venture capitalists might earnestly believe the things they invest in are good for the world. (Editor’s note: Swisher’s relationship with Marc soured several years ago after her failed press outlet, Recode, attacked his firm for advocating caution in the early days of Covid-19, which, ok, probably isn’t really essential context, but does remain funny (hi, Kara!)).
But one of my favorite critiques came from TechCrunch: “When was the last time Marc Andreessen talked to a poor person?” It was an incredible week for this outlet in particular, which only days earlier argued the Gaza strip was a vital “tech hub.” Unserious as it may seem, I do think it worth reflecting on how far this outlet has fallen.
Most young people I talk to don’t realize this, but people used to read TechCrunch. Over the last decade, as the outlet’s relevance declined, their writers, along with many of their peers in the broader press, retreated to childish activism. This attracted eyeballs, but diminished their reputation to the point of its present gutter state, which is all to say I’m not surprised they’re doing clown shit 24/7. They have to pay the bills somehow. But the tech press’s relationship with the industry it purportedly covers is a uniquely weird thing.
Can you imagine Variety attacking a “billionaire” film producer for his passionate defense of movies? Or the Wall Street Journal arguing it’s time to finally shut the markets down, and do communism? Techno-optimism is not surprising from Marc Andreessen. The man has put in great work over the last few years publicly fighting for everything from crypto to artificial intelligence. But the position that technology is good, and a technologically-progressive future will be better, is likewise not surprising from venture capitalists, founders, or tech workers in general. So what is this reaction?
Partly, there’s the Twitter of it all. It’s impossible to overstate how important losing Twitter was to the psychology of the activists in media who shape our culture, and Marc is an outspoken supporter of both Elon and Elon’s version of the platform in which political speech unpopular among tech journalists is not banned. As we presently exist in a constant state of information war, advocacy in favor of “free speech” is considered a high crime, and Marc in particular — who used to banter amicably with the likes of seething mall cop Kara Swisher — is considered an apostate. Then, there’s also his position “ESG” (environmental, social, and corporate governance) is bullshit, which every successful person in business understands, but generally doesn’t say out loud. Journalists and activists tend to go nuclear when you remind them the Tooth Fairy isn’t real, and what do any of us gain from this but momentary pleasure?
The tech press’s most pointed grievance with the manifesto, however, was probably Marc’s position that technology reduces poverty. While this position is common among most rational humans, it undermines the media’s carefully constructed theater in which the rich get richer exclusively at the expense of the American poor, including actual homeless people, who now enjoy the entire knowledge of our world from their pocket supercomputers (which we are not supposed to ever mention). Such facts, for ardent socialists — which this is always about — must be difficult to explain away each day, and industry figures reminding people of the truth is, I think, greatly damaging to their cause (again, it’s socialism).
We should continue to tell the truth.
---
Today in ‘bad people’ lists. Carrying on in our nation’s great tradition of political witch hunts, a website scraped LinkedIn to publish the names, profile pictures, and employers of 17,000 employees who posted “anti semitic” or “anti Israel” comments, or “supportive sentiments of terror.” One of the website’s creators told the New York Times: “We wanted to have it documented… if I work in this company, but I see my friends on LinkedIn celebrating and praising Hamas, then I’m not feeling safe.” (NYT)
The purpose of the list, obviously, is to get people fired for sharing opinions we hate. While some of the actual “yay Hamas” psychos probably deserve it (I have no problem with employers firing literal Nazis publicly expressing literal Nazi shit, for example) many of the people on this list appear to be well-meaning idiots simply showing support for Palestine — which does remain a separate concept, in at least a few important ways, from Hamas.
In the early days of Gaza’s terrorist attack, we witnessed rightful condemnation of such blood-thirsty porn stars as Mia Khalifa, who requested better footage of the raping and kidnapping of Israelis, along with celebrations of the attacks in major cities throughout the west, and from prominent organizations like Black Lives Matter. But with Israel now at war, standard lefty positions like “Israel is bombing civilians,” a dishonest but typical frame, have been lumped into the initial cancellation of people who endorsed actual terrorism. And listen: this is cancellation.
Saturday, Web Summit CEO Paddy Cosgrave resigned in hopes of mitigating blowback following his comments on the conflict (‘Israel is doing war crimes,’ basically), which perhaps existentially threatened his conference. Sponsors such as Amazon, Meta, and Google had already withdrawn from the event (Axios). For the first time in memory, there are real consequences for crazy leftist speech. This is civil war among the institutional libs, and with Palestine absolutely the latest “current thing” of the worst people alive, I regret to inform you the hysterical screeching will soon find its way to an office near you.
Media companies do not want robots reading their shitty work, btw. Since August, at least 535 news organizations — including the New York Times and the Washington Post — have installed code to prevent their online content from being used to train OpenAI’s and Google’s AI models. Last week, a representative of OpenAI confirmed the company has entered talks with newspapers, and may begin paying them to scrape their sites for content (Washington Post).
I haven’t installed any such code at Pirate Wires, for the record, and Sam Altman is not yet paying me. This implies, obviously, the future will include a digital race of Solana reporterbots, none of which will be properly paid for their work. Sad? Amazing? A mixed bag, I think.
Citing an “unreasonable risk to public safety,” the California DMV just revoked Cruise’s permit to operate driverless vehicles. Have I told you lately about the histrionic, secretly union-led war on self-driving cars? Well, the disinformation campaign is working.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration just opened a probe into Cruise to investigate the following: 1) a human driver knocked a lady under a Cruise car, and fled the scene, 2) a Cruise vehicle traveling 1.4 mph bumped into a pedestrian after she walked in front of a green light, and finally 3) two other mysterious videos they found on “public websites” (??) (CNBC).
“So many people asked us about the rampant train robberies taking place in Arizona and New Mexico that we wrote an article about it,” Flexport founder/CEO Ryan Petersen said in a X post on Tuesday. Flexport has apparently recovered over $1 million worth of stolen goods from train robberies, and specifically describes how the thieving, if admittedly charming vagrants do it. “Another option we’ve seen is where they disable the train — by opening a certain valve or cutting a line — at a predetermined location where they have trucks waiting.” Read it here.
Pirates in San Francisco Bay? A senator taking bribes in gold bars? And now we’re doing train heists? Villains absolutely, but villains worthy of the word “villain.” If we have to do chaos I’m glad we’re doing it with style.
---
0 free articles left